The portfolio for grant applications
Almost every grant and residency application asks for a portfolio. Here is what belongs in it, how many works make sense – and why a website often beats the PDF attachment.
What belongs in an application portfolio?
- 8–15 meaningful works – curated beats complete. A jury often sees hundreds of applications; a clear selection with a recognisable line almost always beats the complete catalogue of works.
- For every work: title, year, medium, dimensions — consistently in the same format, so the details can be skimmed quickly.
- A short artist statement (3–5 sentences) and a current CV.
- A clear, calm presentation – the works should register, not the layout. Flashy transitions or playful fonts distract more than they impress.
How do I choose the right works?
The strongest selection follows a recognisable line — not necessarily a single series, but a thread that reveals itself while browsing. Three questions help with the selection:
- Does each work show something the others don't already show? Repetition dilutes the impression, even when every single work is strong.
- Does the selection fit the call? A residency programme for installation needs different emphases than a working grant for painting — the same 15 works rarely fit everywhere equally well.
- Is the order deliberate? The first three works shape the first impression most — the strongest pieces belong at the front, not sorted chronologically to the end.
PDF or website?
A PDF is static, quickly too large for upload limits, and outdated with every new work. A portfolio website can be linked, updated any time, and looks more professional. Many calls ask for a "link to your website" anyway instead of an attachment.
Where a PDF is explicitly required: keep it lean. A file under 10 MB, clearly named
(lastname_portfolio_2026.pdf), without unnecessary cover pages or tables of contents
for a handful of pages.
Image quality without a photo studio
Good daylight shots against a neutral background are enough for most applications — a studio is not a must. More important than high-end equipment: even light without hard shadows, a calm frame and, where possible, a reference object or scale for spatial works.
The most common mistake
Showing too much. A jury sees hundreds of applications – a clear selection with a common thread almost always beats the complete works. The second most common mistake: a portfolio that is not tailored to the specific call but used unchanged for every application.
Frequently asked questions
Do I have to build a new portfolio for every application?
Not from scratch — but selection and order should fit the specific call. An existing portfolio website can usually just be re-sorted for that.
How many images per work make sense, e.g. for installations?
One to three views per work are usually enough — an overall view, perhaps a detail and, for spatial installations, a shot with a recognisable sense of scale.
Should I show unfinished or experimental works?
It can make sense if it honestly shows your current practice — especially for calls that explicitly ask about the development process. As the sole content of the portfolio, rather not.
What if my works differ strongly across media?
A rough grouping by medium or period creates clarity — more important than uniformity of material is a recognisable artistic signature connecting the selection.
Never miss a deadline: subscribe to the deadline calendar (.ics) — it works in any calendar app. Our monthly email newsletter is currently German-only.